Skip to content

Fix regression check, token Location, and small app bugs - #2716

Open
ejsmith wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
fix/server-app-issues
Open

Fix regression check, token Location, and small app bugs#2716
ejsmith wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
fix/server-app-issues

Conversation

@ejsmith

@ejsmith ejsmith commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Small, verified fixes for app and API bugs.

Issue Fix
Fixes #2700 The regression check discarded every event for a stack in the batch, including the newer event that regressed it. It now only discards the older version's events. New pipeline test fails without the fix.
Fixes #2699 The token Location header kept the lowercased token id, which 404s. It now keeps its case. The "empty POST returns 404" part of the issue was wrong: an existing test covers it and gets 201.
Fixes #2703 The throttle check said 30 minutes, but the cache entry expires after 15. Aligned the check and comment to 15, the actual behavior and what the docs say.
Fixes #2704 Plan-limit and throttling emails link to the current FAQ instead of the old wiki.
Fixes #2705 MCP get_project_setup and Exie no longer call the JavaScript client legacy.
Fixes #2701 The Discard dialog says future events are discarded and existing ones are kept.
Part of #2702 A Slack settings change that hits a plan limit (426) shows the upgrade dialog instead of a generic error. Whether Free plans can connect Slack is still open in the issue.

Tests: Token, MCP, Mail, Jobs, Assistant and pipeline tests pass. In ClientApp, npm run check and the unit tests pass.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 4, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-04T19:56:32.226816Z 4555f5f PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Branch Rate Complexity Health
Exceptionless.AppHost 23% 22% 130 ❌
Exceptionless.Core 78% 70% 10988 ✔
Exceptionless.Insulation 51% 43% 370 ➖
Exceptionless.Web 86% 72% 9427 ✔
Summary 81% (28619 / 35495) 70% (14327 / 20504) 20915 ✔

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment