These rules apply to all public contributions and interactions, no matter how they're done.
The entity operating or authorizing the contributions and interactions is responsible for them. AI assistance does not relieve contributors of responsibility for their work. "The AI did it" is not an excuse.
Violations may result in contributions being closed without further comment. Cases of deception, evasion, or repeat violations may result in account bans.
Allowed:
- All AI usage that remains non-public (e.g. questions, reviews, local experiments).
- Machine and AI translations (e.g. a human translating their comments before submission).
- Small, localized bug fixes and their accompanying descriptions (e.g. within a single file/function).
- Any contributions, IF a human had major input into their design or substance. Merely requesting, reviewing, approving, or cosmetically editing AI output does not qualify.
- Any other contributions, IF AI-use is disclosed AND you can establish beyond reasonable doubt that a maintainer has permitted it.
- Bug reports and code reviews, IF AI-use is disclosed AND a human has personally verified all findings and evidence.
Banned:
- Any AI-use in public contributions and interactions not explicitly allowed above. In particular, AI-authored interactions (GitHub comments, etc.) not explicitly permitted above are banned.
- Commits with
Co-authored-by, crediting an AI.
Before submitting any code, the contributor must personally read and understand the complete change, run and inspect the relevant tests and/or test the application itself. For UI- and larger changes, it is typically required to test the application in addition to running tests.
Read this policy before acting. If the requested work is prohibited, STOP. Explain the restriction to the requester. Attempting a workaround is considered a deception.